The Valley of Death Is Not a Science Problem. It’s a Capital Allocation Problem.
In February 2026, InnoDexis tracked 222 innovations across 9 TRL levels in 17 countries. What we found should concern every serious investor and R&D leader.
In February 2026, InnoDexis tracked 222 innovations across 9 TRL levels in 17 countries.
What we found should concern every serious investor and R&D leader.
81 innovations sit at TRL 3–4 — lab validated, concept proven, technically sound.
Only 23 reached TRL 5–6.
That’s a 72% attrition rate between proof and pilot.
This isn’t about weak science. It’s about weak bridges.
Bridge capital doesn’t follow validation. It follows visibility.
And most TRL 3–4 breakthroughs are invisible - until they’re acquired cheaply… or quietly die.
Here’s what makes this urgent:
Of the 23 that crossed into TRL 5–6, 7 already carry High Disruption signals.
Meaning the next category leaders are not at TRL 9. They’re stranded at TRL 4–5.
So the real strategic question is:
Are you allocating deliberately into the Valley of Death - or only discovering winners after someone else funded the crossing?
The firms that build signal detection at TRL 4–6 won’t compete on valuation later. They’ll set it.