Research

The Valley of Death Is Not a Science Problem. It’s a Capital Allocation Problem.

In February 2026, InnoDexis tracked 222 innovations across 9 TRL levels in 17 countries. What we found should concern every serious investor and R&D leader.

The Valley of Death Is Not a Science Problem. It’s a Capital Allocation Problem.

In February 2026, InnoDexis tracked 222 innovations across 9 TRL levels in 17 countries.

What we found should concern every serious investor and R&D leader.

81 innovations sit at TRL 3–4 — lab validated, concept proven, technically sound.

Only 23 reached TRL 5–6.

That’s a 72% attrition rate between proof and pilot.

This isn’t about weak science. It’s about weak bridges.

Bridge capital doesn’t follow validation. It follows visibility.

And most TRL 3–4 breakthroughs are invisible - until they’re acquired cheaply… or quietly die.

Here’s what makes this urgent:

Of the 23 that crossed into TRL 5–6, 7 already carry High Disruption signals.

Meaning the next category leaders are not at TRL 9. They’re stranded at TRL 4–5.

So the real strategic question is:

Are you allocating deliberately into the Valley of Death - or only discovering winners after someone else funded the crossing?

The firms that build signal detection at TRL 4–6 won’t compete on valuation later. They’ll set it.

Ready to go beyond this brief?